Bio Balls Aquarium Filter Media

7.2.7. Bio Balls Aquarium Filter Media

Bio balls have a moderately low surface area which makes them one of the less efficient biomedia for submerged filters. This was confirmed by a test run on the ammonia-oxidizing capability of various filter media. Bio balls did not perform very well in this test. The only good use for bioballs is as a media in trickle filters.

A Test

A test of the ammonia-oxidizing capability of various filter media was run. The first number, the “efficiency” is the average ammonia oxidizing that 15 cubic inches of media accomplished over a 90-day period. The second number is the “effective” surface area in square feet per cubic feet calculated from that test. The third number is the effective surface area in square feet per cubic feet calculated by simple mathematics. The correlation between the test results and the calculated surface area is very significant and means the testing was accurate.

Media“Efficiency”
from two
tests
“Effective”
Surface Area
ft2/ft3
ft2/ft3
from Math
30 PPI Foam17340400
Pot Scrubbers1428080
Static K1 Media13260200
Aquarium Gravel6120120
Blue Matala Pads5100120
Eshopps Bio Balls510060
1/4 to 1/2 inch
lava rock
36060
Matrix36030
BioHome Ultimate24030
Ceramic Rings24040
Filter biomedia efficiency

The higher the numbers here the better the media. This makes 30 ppi foam the best static media for canisters and ceramic rings the worst. Bioballs did not do too well in these two tests. But bio balls are the best media for aerating trickle filters due to the relationship between the size of the openings and the size of a drop of water.

Types of Bioballs

There are many variations on bioballs. For instance:

Good Bio Ball design from Seapora
Good Bio Ball design from Seapora
Good Bio Ball design from Eshopps
Good Bio Ball design from Eshopps

The bioballs with an open design and cylindrical plastic surfaces are the best media for trickle filters.

One type of bioball has a hollow center filled with urethane foam. Sounds good, but since there is no pressure drop across the foam in a submerged filter, there is going to be very little flow through the foam. This means it is just a good marketing talking point, not a true benefit.

Foam Bio Balls, not a good design.
Foam Bio Balls, not a good design.

This foam bioball media will be slightly better than straight bioballs in a trickle filter for biofiltration. The foam will adsorb water and move it though the foam as it drips onto the bioballs, which will give some added biofiltration. The foam does nothing for aeration.

Note that some bioballs have narrow slots molded in them which are less than the diameter of a drop of water (roughly 3 millimeters or 1/8 of an inch). These bioballs don’t work well in a trickle filter.

Not the best bioball design
Not the best bioball design

In small quantities, bioballs are expensive ($15 to $40 per liter). In large quantities, they are far less expensive ($3.48 for one gallon, $25 for one cubic foot or 7.5 gallons).

Note that trickle filters using bioballs have quite rightly fallen out of favor with home aquarists. Trickle filters have about 25% of the efficiency of a static submerged filter on a cubic inch to cubic inch basis.


Startpage Aquariumscience

Source: Aquariumscience.org – David Bogert

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Searchfilter
zoekfilter

Neuws, Updates en Promotions

Would you like to be kept informed of News, Updates and Promotions on the AquaInfo website? Subscribe below!